2026-08-07 · contested story

GOP senators vote to hold Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress for invoking the Fifth during tense hearing

A Republican-led Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee voted 8-5 (with two additional proxy no votes) along party lines on August 6, 2026, to hold Dr. Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress after the 85-year-old former NIAID director invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination more than 100 times during a July 29 hearing about his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. Committee chairman Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) argued that Fauci had no valid Fifth Amendment claim because a preemptive pardon issued by former President Joe Biden nullified any risk of federal prosecution, and Paul opted to send the referral directly to the Justice Department rather than to the full Senate, where it would likely fail a 60-vote threshold. Fauci's attorneys and Democrats called the vote a politically motivated stunt, while the Justice Department confirmed it received the referral and was reviewing it.

How each side frames it

left
"repeatedly pleaded the fifth amendment to parry a hostile inquisition into his stewardship of the response to the Covid-19 pandemic"
"whom Fauci last week accused of having an “unhinged obsession” with him as he refused to answer questions at the hearing"
"more than 150 infectious-disease experts and other scientists wrote that “no credible evidence has been produced to support these absurd charges” and that they are “urging our elected representatives in Congress to stop these witch-hunts.”"
"The goal was to wait for Dr. Fouchy to make any kind of misstatement and then have a weaponized Department of Justice file criminal charges for that new statement that would not have been covered by the pardon, leaving Dr. Fouchy little choice but to invoke his constitutional right to not walk directly into a trap."
"“Today's partisan committee vote is a crude political stunt intended to punish Dr. Fauci for exercising his constitutional rights,” Schertler said in a statement."
center
"Stanley Brand, a lawyer specializing in congressional investigations, said Paul's decision to bypass a full Senate vote could render his referral “null and void.”"
"Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, the committee chairman, said that constitutional protection did not apply since Fauci last year received a pardon... Fauci and Democrats who opposed the contempt resolution said he had a well-founded fear of self-incrimination given a public desire by Republicans to seek his prosecution."
"Recommendations were being made by numerous scientists and public health officials at the time, not any one individual, said Jennifer Kates... “When new information became available, recommendations changed, but not always fast enough or clearly enough,” Kates said."
"There’s no new scientific evidence supporting the theory that the virus might instead have leaked from a laboratory, a theory Paul champions. A GOP-led subcommittee that studied the question in 2024 found no evidence linking Fauci to wrongdoing."
"He said while some Republicans are likely true believers that Fauci committed crimes, bringing him to the forefront serves a dual purpose in a midterm election year — distracting voters from less favorable headlines, including on the economy and foreign conflicts."
right
"“Dr. Fauci was subpoenaed to testify, and refused to answer over 100 times,” Senator James Lankford, one of the Republicans on the committee, posted to X. “That's not accountability to the people we serve. I voted today to hold him in contempt.”"
"EXCLUSIVE: Sen. Lummis: Fauci ‘Lied to the American People and Congress’ and Is ‘Responsible for the Overwhelming Number of Deaths’ Because He Blocked Ivermectin"
"“I do know this: He’s responsible for the overwhelming number of deaths that occurred in this country that did not occur in other countries because they were using ivermectin,” Lummis told The Gateway Pundit."
"More Americans have died with COVID-19 listed as the cause of death than the number of U.S. service members killed in World War II."
"“Dr. Fauci appeared under subpoena and invoked the Fifth Amendment to refuse answering questions,” Paul said in a statement, adding that he had ruled the privilege did not apply because of the pardon and that Fauci had waived it by giving opening testimony."

What each side left out

The left left out — covered by the Al Jazeera & Newsweek & WSJ
The left left out — covered by the PBS NewsHour & The Hill
The right left out — covered by the Associated Press & CBC News & Al Jazeera
The right left out — covered by the Reuters & Al Jazeera & PBS NewsHour
The center left out — covered by the The Gateway Pundit
The center left out — covered by the The Guardian US

What's actually true?

[verified] The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee voted 8-5 along party lines to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress.
[verified] Fauci invoked the Fifth Amendment more than 100 times (specifically 111) during the July 29 hearing.
[verified] Biden preemptively pardoned Fauci in January 2025 covering conduct from January 1, 2014 to January 19, 2025.
[verified] Paul referred the contempt resolution directly to the Justice Department, bypassing a full Senate vote that would require a 60-vote threshold.
[verified] The Justice Department confirmed it received the referral and is reviewing it.
[verified] A GOP-led subcommittee that studied the lab-leak question in 2024 found no evidence linking Fauci to wrongdoing, and there is no new scientific evidence supporting the lab-leak theory.
[contested] The claim that Fauci is 'responsible for the overwhelming number of deaths' because he blocked ivermectin, an effective treatment.
[verified] More than 150 infectious-disease experts wrote a public letter defending Fauci, calling the charges 'absurd' and a 'witch-hunt.'

The narrative clash

Whether Fauci retains Fifth Amendment protection despite the pardon
Left: “Those rights are not negated by the existence of a pardon... A federal pardon does not eliminate an individual’s Fifth Amendment protection if they still face a ‘real and appreciable’ risk of federal or state prosecution.”
Right: “Let’s just get one thing straight. You don’t have any rights under the Fifth Amendment because you’ve been pardoned, as you very well know, as the Supreme Court has been clear for a century”
Whether Fauci lied about NIH funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan
Left: The National Institutes of Health has also rejected it, saying the viruses studied with U.S. funding differed from the one that caused COVID-19.
Right: “He has certainly lied to the American people and to the Congress” and “Virologists worldwide knew that Ivermectin was a successful treatment... and Dr. Fauci opposed what he knew was a successful and inexpensive and readily available treatment.”
Whether invoking the Fifth is an admission of guilt
Left: In fact, individuals who invoke constitutional protections not to answer questions under oath are not admitting guilt of any crime.
Right: “Yeah, well, silence is admission.”

33 sources analyzed

The Guardian US PBS NewsHour WXOW Al Jazeera CBC News MSN (UK) U.S. News & World Report Newsweek Associated Press CBS News The Damage Report The Hill Reuters WBAL 11 Colorado Politics The Wall Street Journal Yahoo! Search Fox 29 KABB FOX 23 Maine The Daily Reflector KFOX 14 WANDTV CBS 17 News 8000 The Times of Israel The Journal Times Springfield News-Sun Pittsburgh Tribune-Review The Times of Northwest Indiana My Panhandle News The Jerusalem Post The Gateway Pundit Newsmax

Perspectivity reads the coverage — not just who published it.

Read the full interactive analysis →