2026-08-10 · contested story

ACLU blasts Trump’s new orders on birthright citizenship, saying they are doomed to fail in court– as it happened

On August 6, 2026, President Donald Trump signed two executive orders attempting to restrict birthright citizenship and curb so-called 'birth tourism,' just over a month after the Supreme Court struck down his earlier, broader effort in a 6-3 ruling on June 30. The first order expands the categories of children deemed ineligible for automatic citizenship—including children of 'alien enemies,' foreign government employees, and those born through commercial 'birth tourism' arrangements—while the second directs the State Department and DHS to halt visa access for foreign nationals entering the U.S. to give birth. The ACLU immediately condemned the orders as doomed, with Cody Wofsy, deputy director of the ACLU's Immigrants' Rights Project, declaring that 'birthright citizenship is guaranteed by the Constitution' and 'no additional executive order can change the meaning of the Constitution.'

How each side frames it

left
"Undeterred by a decade of failure, Trump's obsessive campaign against birthright citizenship goes on, and on"
"What they want is a large sub-pool of stateless and rightless people that they can target with state violence. I think that's the essence of this."
"their movement isn't actually just about securing the border. It's about ethnically cleansing the country."
"It's as close to the core of Trump's message and agenda as his related claims that Democrats are regularly stealing elections by deploying the many millions of swarthy illegal voters"
"The second executive order has a title so saccharine that you know it must have given Stephen Miller a thrill when he picked it out"
center
"Trump's new orders are likely to face legal challenge. Legal experts said it was unclear what effect the executive orders might have given the Supreme Court ruling"
"The administration argues the new directive does not fall within the limits of the Supreme Court ruling, as it seeks to reinterpret the narrow, historical exceptions to citizenship at birth"
"Estimates of how many women might engage in this practice annually are uncertain, but U.S. Census data shows vastly fewer instances — 26,000 babies a year — than the administration's estimate of more than 3.5 million yearly"
""Discerning intent of a parent is challenging and open to abuse," Johnson said. He said both orders "read like political statements.""
""That practice of birth tourism is, as of the signing of this order, hereby banned," White House aide Stephen Miller said"
right
"Trump said the executive order would stop wealthy people from "buying their way" into citizenship with pregnant women traveling to the US to birth an American baby."
""Birth tourism is by definition a fraud on the American system, on the American taxpayer," Stephen Miller... said at the ceremony."
"criminal rings are setting up a system whereby tens, hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands of people can come to this country in an organized fashion and give birth here purely for the sake of obtaining birthright citizenship"
"Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley analyzes the legal fight over President Donald Trump's executive orders on birthright citizenship"

What each side left out

The left left out — covered by the Axios & Newsweek & AP News & 13abc
The right left out — covered by the USA Today & Reuters & CBS News & Politico
The left left out — covered by the MPR News & Axios & Time Magazine & Honolulu Star-Advertiser
The center left out — covered by the The New Republic & World Socialist Web Site
The right left out — covered by the 13wham.com & WBFF & Time Magazine

What's actually true?

[verified] Trump signed two executive orders on August 6, 2026 targeting birthright citizenship and birth tourism, a little over a month after the Supreme Court struck down his earlier effort on June 30 in a 6-3 ruling.
[verified] The ACLU's Cody Wofsy stated the orders will 'meet the same fate as the last one' and that no executive order can change the meaning of the Constitution.
[verified] The Center for Immigration Studies estimated between 20,000 and 25,000 mothers came to the U.S. for birth tourism in a year-long period between 2016 and 2017, and there were 3.6 million births in the U.S. in 2025.
[verified] CDC data shows fewer than 10,000 (approximately 9,600) births in the U.S. to mothers with foreign addresses in 2024.
[verified] The Supreme Court's June 30 ruling was 6-3, but only five justices held birthright citizenship is enshrined in the Constitution; Justice Kavanaugh rejected Trump's order on federal statutory grounds rather than constitutional grounds.
[verified] Trump vowed to seek a rehearing 'IMMEDIATELY' but the 25-day deadline passed without the administration filing a petition, and the Supreme Court issued a certified judgment affirming the lower court ruling.
[verified] Federal law/regulation (implemented in 2020 during Trump's first term) already bans obtaining a tourist visa for the primary purpose of obtaining U.S. citizenship for a child by giving birth in the United States.
[verified] The orders could affect people born in U.S. territories such as Puerto Rico only if Congress enacts a proposed law to end automatic citizenship there; a bill was introduced but is not expected to pass.

The narrative clash

Scale of birth tourism
Left: billions of people are 'one plane ride away from having a child who's a U.S. citizen.' But a 2020 analysis... found that the number of 'birth tourism' cases hovers around 20,000 to 26,000 per year, or less than 1 percent of all American births.
Right: Trump said the number is in the 'hundreds of thousands.' "It's become a big business, and we're ending that business," the president said.
Constitutionality of the new orders
Left: "The Supreme Court already decided this issue: Birthright citizenship is guaranteed by the Constitution. No additional executive order can change the meaning of the Constitution."
Right: A White House staffer added during the event that there was "absolutely nothing" that would run "afoul" of the recent court ruling on the subject.
Original meaning of the 14th Amendment
Left: "The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land.' We keep that promise today," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote
Right: "As the president mentioned, the 14th Amendment was passed exclusively in the aftermath of the Civil War, so that to ensure that the children of slaves would be citizens. It had no other meaning and purpose outside of that"

66 sources analyzed

The Guardian The New Republic CNN The Washington Post New York Magazine The Daily Beast Politico NBC News USA Today MPR News The Damage Report CBC Los Angeles Times The Independent NPR PBS Al Jazeera Civil Discourse with Joyce Vance MSN (UK) CBS News 13wham.com CNN Reuters BBC Axios WSJ The Hill ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos WBAL-TV Yahoo MS NOW C-SPAN courthousenews.com NBC4 Washington Bloomberg.com KCCI NDTV South China Morning Post SCOTUSblog Scripps News upi.com kare11.com Newsweek rawstory.com The Denver Post Honolulu Star-Advertiser AP News Japan Today KCRA KATU Time Magazine Democracy Now! WBFF heraldcourier.com the-independent.com Yahoo Finance helenair.com World Socialist Web Site The Des Moines Register The Presidential Prayer Team thegazette.com CT Mirror WTVG New York Post WMTW 8 Fox News

Perspectivity reads the coverage — not just who published it.

Read the full interactive analysis →